Subject	any DISadvantages with the 1994-1995 Z compared to earlier?
Posted by	tranzlucent on December 06, 2003 at 11:55 AM
	This message has been viewed 62 times.
Message	After doing loads of research here on TT.net (this site and its members rock!) I have finally narrowed down my new car search to a 1994 or 1995 NA 2 seater manual Z. But before I run off and buy one I just want to double check with all the Z gurus out there about the actual differences in Zs. As far as I can tell the changes after 1993, were for the better: - dual airbags - seatbelts on pillar, not door - anything else important on the NA? (I know TTs got electric HICAS...) but was there anything BETTER about the 1990 - 1993 NA Zs? (By the way I am ruling out the 1996 NA Z because of the OBDII change) thanks, and appreciate any advice. TRANZLUCENT
Follow Ups	any DISadvantages with the 1994-1995 Z compared to earlier? - tranzlucent 11:55:19 12/06/03 Yeah, you can't find them as readily as 90-93 :) (n/m) - Z Wang(Austin) 12:07:56 12/06/03 Official number of Z's produced 90 to 96 (Motortrend=source) - infamouseb (NYC) 14:16:33 12/06/03 I believe 95 Z are harder to mod.. due to smog law for 95+ (n/m) - SonicZ 12:40:54 12/06/03 95 is ok, the 96 has OBD II (n/m) - Technomancer 13:58:01 12/06/03 Check out the site FAQ, they have a list of what changed - kruZing 14:12:40 12/06/03 Re: any DISadvantages with the 1994-1995 Z compared to earlier? - StormShadow 14:17:55 12/06/03 Earlier models had better quality carpeting & sound dead- - YugoBernie (NoVA) 02:09:05 12/07/03 cool, thanks for the advice Bernie. (n/m) - tranzlucent 04:55:10 12/07/03
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.